Mediators substantively engaging with substantive process design encounter the substantive caucus versus joint session decision repeatedly. Substantive framework supporting the decision rests on substantive consideration of substantive case dynamics, substantive party considerations, and substantive substantive analytical work the session needs to support.
When caucus serves substantively
Substantive caucus serves substantively when substantive parties cannot substantively communicate in joint session. Substantive caucus supports substantive substantive analytical work that requires substantive party engagement without substantive cross-party dynamics.
When joint session serves substantively
Substantive joint session serves substantively when substantive direct party engagement supports substantive substantive outcome quality. Substantive joint session supports substantive substantive party ownership of substantive outcomes.
Substantive substantive working framework
Substantive substantive analysis of substantive case dynamics. Substantive substantive analysis of substantive party communication patterns. Substantive substantive analysis of substantive substantive analytical work the session needs to support.
How VennBoard supports mediation practice
A mediation practice with substantive process design capability produces substantive outcomes. VennBoard provides the structured workspace where mediator cases are managed. If you are a mediator looking for the case-management infrastructure that matches your practice, visit VennBoard.com to learn how VennBoard fits into your work.